Human rights as a contemporary paradigm of international diplomacy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/dydh.v1i1.8

Keywords:

International Law, Inter-American Human Rightsghts System, Human Dignity, Human Rights, Diplomacy

Abstract

This article analyzes the evolution of human rights-based diplomacy as the result of a historical process that transformed international relations from a model centered on State interests into one oriented toward the protection of human dignity. It argues that this transformation was consolidated through the development of constitutionalism, international humanitarian law, and international human rights law, particularly following the World Wars and the establishment of the United Nations. The study further examines the transition from the rule-of-law state to the constitutional state, highlighting the incorporation of principles such as human dignity, social justice, pacta sunt servanda, and the self-determination of peoples as the foundations of contemporary diplomatic action. It also explores the agendas developed within the United Nations and the Inter-American Human Rights System, emphasizing the growing specialization in issues concerning women, Indigenous peoples, children, migrants, development, the environment, and transitional justice. Finally, it argues that twenty-first-century diplomacy must operate in accordance with international and constitutional human rights commitments, preserving multilateralism, the peaceful settlement of disputes, and compliance with the decisions of international bodies as essential elements for the effective protection of the individual and human dignity.

Author Biography

Héctor Oswaldo Samayoa Sosa , Universidad Rafael Landivar

Doctorando en Derecho Constitucional Internacional por la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Profesor e investigador universitario. Autor de libros y artículos de revista sobre derechos humanos, derecho internacional humanitario, derecho penal y derecho penitenciario. Columnista de opinión. Diplomático.

References

Bugnion, F. (2020). Gustav Moynier. (L. F. Martínez, Trad.) San José, San José , Costa Rica: Sociedad Henry Dunant.

Cruz, G. E. (2017). El Amparo, los derechos fundamentales y otros conceptos claves en el proceso de amparo. Guatemala: Gaceta Jurídica.

dipublico.org. (06 de 06 de 2010). dipublico.org . Obtenido de Derecho Internacional: https://www.dipublico.org/1729/tratado-de-paz-de-versalles-1919-en-espanol/

García-Bauer, C. (1984). Panamericanismo y Universalismo. Guatemala: Editorial Universitaria.

Hérnandez Valle, R. (2005). Constituciones Iberoamericanas: Costa Rica. México: Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México. Obtenido de https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/4/1541/9.pdf

Instituto de Estudios Latino-Americanos. (3 de 3 de 2022). Instituto de Estudios Latino-Americanos. (U. F. Catarina, Editor) Obtenido de https://iela.ufsc.br/primera-declaracion-de-barbados-por-la-liberacion-del-indigena/

Justia. (2025). Obtenido de Justia: https://mexico.justia.com/federales/constitucion-politica-de-los-estados-unidos-mexicanos/gdoc/

Padilla, L. (2009). Paz y conflicto en el siglo XXI: Teoría de las relaciones internacionales. Guatemala: Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales e Investigación para la Paz.

Samayoa, H. O. (2022). Apuntes de Derecho Internacional Humanitario. Guatemala: F&GEditores.

Vigo, R. (2018). Los Neoconstitucionalismos: cuatro versiones. . Buenos Aires: Academia Nacional de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales .

Weller, T. (Diciembre de 2015). Atlas en línea sobre la historia del humanitarismo y los derechos humanos. (M. P. Fabian Klose, Ed.) Recuperado el 15 de 10 de 2025, de Viena, 1815: Primer condena internacional de la trata de esclavos : https://hhr--atlas-ieg--mainz-de.translate.goog/articles/weller-vienna?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=es&_x_tr_pto=tc

Published

2026-08-07

How to Cite

Samayoa Sosa , H. O. (2026). Human rights as a contemporary paradigm of international diplomacy. Revista DYDH, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29105/dydh.v1i1.8